Is Route 100 North County Trailway Crosswalk Safe Enough?

Cars approach a crosswalk at the North County Trailway entrances on Sept. 22, 2021. The posted speed limit is 55 mph on this part of Route 100 in Briarcliff Manor. Photo by Robert Brum

When the state rebuilt Route 100 from Millwood to Briarcliff Manor, it added improved connections with the North County Trailway to accommodate scores of pedestrians and cyclists traveling the busy corridor.   

As part of the 2020 project, a crosswalk was installed three-tenths of a mile south of the traffic light at Chappaqua Road, including road markings and signs alerting drivers and trailway users to approach with caution. 

But the crosswalk’s location in a heavily trafficked, 55 mph zone has raised questions about potential uncertainty among drivers and trailway users about who has the right of way.  

Among the questions:  

  • Do motorists traveling at highway speeds know if and when they are required to stop when approaching a crosswalk?  
  • Do the signs approaching the crosswalk give drivers enough time to make a decision about whether or not to hit the brakes? 
  • When are trailway users expecting drivers to let them cross?  
Cyclist Kate Marshall prepares to cross Route 100 to connect with the North County Trailway on Sept. 22, 2021. Photo by Robert Brum

State law dictates drivers must stop if a pedestrian or a person with a bicycle has already entered a crosswalk, but are supposed to keep going if the person has not yet entered the crosswalk.  

The state Department of Transportation and Westchester County’s parks department have pledged to make safety upgrades to the crossing, after these issues were raised by The River Journal in August. 

North County Trailway signage on the northbound side of Route 100 in Briarcliff Manor on Sept. 22, 2021. Photo by Robert Brum

The state DOT will be moving the yellow pedestrian/bicycle crossing signs to new locations further away from the crosswalk in the coming weeks, a DOT spokeswoman told The River Journal in an email. She did not return messages seeking details about when or where this would be done. 

Also, the county will be installing a pair of signs on the trailway’s southbound entrance warning users to stop and to walk bikes across the intersection, Peter Tartaglia, first deputy commissioner of Westchester’s Parks, Recreation & Conservation Department, wrote in an email to River Journal. That signage already exists on the northbound entrance to the trailway, which is part of the Empire State Trail. 

The state also built a crosswalk and erected signs where the trailway meets the Route 100 ramp onto northbound Route 9A, where the speed limit is only 30 mph. 

For Good Measure 

Briarcliff’s Deputy Mayor Peter Chatzky also has raised concerns about the Route 100 crosswalk, after taking measurements of the approaches. 

He wrote to the DOT on Sept. 16, requesting that signage warning drivers about the crosswalk be moved from 200 feet from the trailway entrances to at least 400 feet away. Chatzky stated the signs’ placement is more appropriate for a 45 mph speed limit rather than the 55 mph permitted in that stretch. 

“Because this is a new cyclist crossing on a often busy street with vehicles travelling in excess of 60 mph,” Chatzky wrote, “the ideal solution might be to add flashing beacons to the warning signs, which should be relocated further from the crossing path, to allow more drivers time to slow for crossing cyclists and pedestrians.”  

Chatzky later told River Journal: “I drive that route several times a week. … If I didn’t know the crosswalk was there, an out of town driver on this route, would I notice to stop? And that’s when I thought, it does seem close.”  

He pointed out that the new crosswalk is in a more visible location than the spot near the 9A split where trailway users formerly crossed Route 100. But the new location’s placement in a 55 mph zone created separate issues. 

Related stories: 

Are Bike Paths the Road to the Future? 

Want a new bike? Need a repair? Good luck with that 

Bicycle Man: A two-wheel love affair 

Interested in bicycling in the Hudson Valley and beyond? Read Robert Brum’s Shifting Gears blog.

1 Comment

  1. I frequently ride the north county trailway from Briarcliff to Baldwin Place, and beyond sometimes, and the original x-over by 9a was dangerous because traffic entering and exiting 100 made for a dicey cross from one side of 100 to the other, the new crossover while free of traffic merging has vehicles traveling at highway speed. I don’t use this crossover for that reason, I will drift across the street because I can make a better judgment of when it’s safe to cross, while traffic moves along, there is not all that much that I can’t make a course change to avoid a problem. I also cross route 6 at old church road and some cars stop, others don’t so I don’t assume that all drivers are going to stop, and wait till all clear or both sides are stopped allowing me to pass. I can’t see drivers stopping on 100, crossover should be at Chappaqua rd, where there is a traffic light already, bikes can safely cross because they could wait for the light. A pedestrian activated device, a push button could be installed at both sides of 100. Why wasn’t this done in the first place

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended For You

About the Author: Robert Brum