River Towns Weigh Pros, Cons of Marijuana Sales and Consumption

Marijuana has been legal in the state of New York since April, when the Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act went into effect. Included in the legislation is a provision that every municipality can choose to “opt out” of allowing marijuana-based businesses within their borders but must do so by the end of the calendar year. 

According to the legislation, local officials can pass a local law opting out of allowing dispensaries (retail sales), consumption sites (smoking lounges), or both, although they cannot pass any laws restricting the legality of marijuana. Once a town opts in, the decision cannot be reversed, but a town that opts out can repeal its decision at any time. 

Opting out of either option means that a town will also be opting out of potential tax revenue from these businesses – 3% of the overall 13% sales tax placed on cannabis transactions. 

Many municipalities have spent the past several months consulting experts, activists, and their constituents on the issue. The Irvington Board of Trustees listened to members of the village’s Community Advisory Board at a July meeting. The Town of Ossining hosted a public hearing in August. Tarrytown hosted a public information session in September. The City of Peekskill distributed a survey to the community and held its own public hearing in early October.  

“We have always been depicted as the place to get your drugs,” said Peekskill Deputy Mayor Vivian McKenzie at a September City Council meeting. “All money is not good money.” 

Local officials’ hesitancy on the issue is based on old ways of thinking, according to attorney Andrew Schriever of the Hudson Valley Cannabis Industry Association. 

“People still approach the idea of cannabis as something that is uniquely bad, that it is evil, it leads to crime and aggressive behavior, and people can overdose on it,” says Schriever. “None of that is true, and you shouldn’t have to take my word for it.” 

Schriever said there is overwhelming evidence to suggest cannabis is safer than alcohol, which is already available for retail purchase and consumption. 

A trend that has emerged among municipalities is opting out of consumption lounges, but not dispensaries. Officials representing the Town and Village of Ossining, the Village of Briarcliff Manor, and the City of Peekskill have all indicated they are leaning in that direction. The Village of Croton-on-Hudson has already opted out of lounges. 

“I think the reason people say they don’t want on-site consumption is because they’re worried about the stigma,” says Schriever. “When you think about it, that’s a little bit backwards – it’s actually nicer for the community if people who want to make that decision have a place that’s nice to go, that’s inside and properly ventilated.” 

Since marijuana is now legal to consume wherever cigarette smoking is allowed, many municipalities have been adapting or amending their existing public smoking laws. 

“We were a bit forward-thinking in that we banned smoking several years ago in our parks,” says Sleepy Hollow Mayor Ken Wray. “I think banning smoking on public streets is going to be really difficult, but we are looking at ways in which we can restrict the areas in which people are able to smoke.” 

The Village of Tarrytown has amended its existing smoking ban to include specific language about marijuana and vaping. The City of Peekskill is preparing to pass a resolution officially banning smoking of any kind in its public parks. 

Some are concerned that without providing a legal spot to consume marijuana, such as a designated lounge, residents will be more likely to smoke in public – particularly those living in public housing or other dwellings where smoking is prohibited. This issue was raised by Ossining Village Trustee Omar Lopez at a July meeting. 

“Anywhere you can smoke tobacco, you can smoke cannabis,” said Lopez. “I’d like to be able to walk down the street without having someone smoking cannabis on the sidewalk.” 

“It means that you are literally leaving people who can’t afford their own private homes out in the cold in order to make use of the plant,” says Schriever, who considers this a civil rights issue. “That’s a bit problematic.” 

By deciding not to actively opt out of either scenario, the Village of Sleepy Hollow is poised to allow both dispensaries and lounges. The Village of Irvington, meanwhile, has informally agreed to opt out of both. Several nearby communities such as Somers, Yorktown, and Mount Kisco have already committed to opting out. 

Notably silent on the issue has been the Town of Cortlandt, whose town board still has not decided on if or when a public hearing will be held on the subject. 

Regardless of the decisions local officials make between now at the Dec. 31 deadline, experts believe it will be at least another year until retail cannabis sales are set to begin in New York. 

“The only thing I would really entreat any public official to do is make sure that when they make these decisions, they’re doing it in an informed way,” says Schriever. “At the end of the day, it has to be based on data.” 

1 Comment

  1. There are those who may believe that all money, regardless of the source or the manner in which it is obtained, is good.

    I would strenuously dispute this supposition. While any number of things may be legal, in various communities around the world, it does not, naturally and necessarily, follow that they are beneficial for a community or that it is ethical for those in elected office to forcibly foist it upon their community.

    We moved to Peekskill from Mount Vernon in 2011, and have witnessed many of the initiatives and efforts to promote this city as a destination for tourism and for those seeking to invest in a home (or a business) and raise a family here. To be sure, Peekskill has much to recommend it: proximity to Manhattan, a vibrant arts community, venues for live entertainment, a multiplicity of restaurants, a walkable downtown, and impressive natural beauty, including enviable views of the Hudson. Are we to take ten steps backward now?

    I would submit that welcoming cannabis dispensaries and lounges to Peekskill, no matter where they were situated within the bounds of the city, would be regressive. Do we really wish to be known as the “go-to” location for recreational drug use in Westchester County? Why should we be lumbered with that dubious distinction? We should not aspire to be “Mount Vernon North.”

    The argument that it will eradicate illegal drug trafficking is specious at best. A dealer lingering outside a deli pays no tax, pays no rent, pays no employee benefits, pays into no profit-sharing or pension scheme, pays no utility costs, pays no insurance, pays no property tax, and pays no dues to the local chamber of commerce. His (or her) overhead, such as it is, is minuscule by comparison, ensuring they shall continue to provide a cheaper product—this is purely an economic truth, whether you wish to accept it or not.

    The medical use of cannabinoids is not in question here, though there are those who would gladly blur, confuse, and conflate medical and recreational use in order to urge acceptance of the latter.

    What is at stake here is the character and tenor of this city. As it is, I regularly hear police and ambulance calls regarding intoxicated and overdosed individuals who require medical assistance. Do we really want to add recreational marijuana into the mix? I do not consider this a credible plan of action to improve quality of life.

    While I am sure that our tax base has been eroded due to COVID19—and—even predating this global health concern—we had an abundance of empty store fronts and retail space in Peekskill—even so—there must be another, better way, to bolster our local economy.

    It may be tempting to look at drugs as an easy fix to inject some vitality into our local economy, but I would ask you, first, to consider the seriously mixed message you will be sending young people, many who have gone through the DARE program, about the risks of recreational drug use. What do we tell them now? That drug use is acceptable as long as it attracts people with disposable income to Peekskill? As long as it lines the pockets of investors?

    It shows a singular paucity of intelligence to willfully put on blinkers to the very real potential for collateral damage to our community, especially when there is ample evidence from the NIH and NIMH that these are not benign substances and carry real risks to both physical and mental health.

    I would ask—what next? A SIS (Supervised Injection Site) for heroin use? City-regulated brothels, so that local government can be sure to receive their “cut”? The line must be drawn somewhere, or else we risk finding ourselves and our children and grandchildren sinking and drowning in a sewer of our own making.

    There comes a moment when one has to remove their rose-colored spectacles and recognize that, on some occasions, the only correct and ethical response is a resounding “no” — and to have the backbone to say it emphatically in spite of the wantwits who would gaily lead one down the road to perdition.

    Are you willing to welcome that devastation and claim it and embrace it and all the collateral damage as your own—or will those of you who have the means to do so decamp to Chappaqua, or Bronxville, or Scarsdale (or some other, wiser, community who opted out) once you witness, firsthand, the negative societal effects on the sidewalks of your city?

    On the most basic of levels it flies in the face of common sense to desire more drug use in Peekskill.

    Why would we wish to cast a veneer of respectability over behaviors that have been documented as blighting the lives of individuals, their families, and, by extension, the larger community?

    Given what we know regarding the potential for negative effects, the only response—grounded in reason and common sense—should be an emphatic—and unequivocal— “No.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended For You

About the Author: Christian Larson